Language assistance and legal representation do different work
An interpreter helps a person understand and participate; a defence lawyer gives legal advice and represents the person’s interests. One does not replace the other. Under the Criminal Procedure Code, language needs should be raised with the competent authority. Identify the location, investigating authority, procedural status and language the person actually understands before arranging assistance.
Understand the statement before signing
Ask for the allegation, recorded status, rights notification and interpreter arrangements to be explained. Whether questioning, detention or a court hearing is involved changes the immediate task. Counsel should review the available record and any access restrictions. Do not assume a translated summary is the full statement. A correction or objection should be addressed through the proper procedural record.
Coordinate contact and the next deadline
Provide the authority and file number if known, the decision or summons and any hearing date. Consular contact and family communication have their own legal framework; they do not replace criminal defence. A power of attorney does not make every procedural participation requirement disappear. The first instruction should focus on the current stage, access to counsel, language assistance and any time-sensitive remedy.
Questions about this procedure
Does an interpreter also act as my lawyer?
No. Interpreting and legal defence are separate roles. A lawyer should assess the allegations, procedure and remedies.