Motor claims
Vehicle Unavailability and Business Loss
Repair periods, replacement transport and documented interruption of vehicle use.
Read the Turkish guide →
01 / LEGAL PREPARATION
Distinguish unavailability from damage and market loss
A vehicle repair claim concerns the damage and repair cost. A market-loss claim concerns the vehicle’s value after repair. Unavailability concerns the period in which the vehicle could not be used and its consequences. Record these separately, with the proposed responsible party for each request. Having traffic or casco cover does not mean every item falls under the same policy. Replacement-vehicle assistance may also be a contractual service with its own conditions. Read the policy and assistance wording rather than relying on the product name. A useful file explains when the vehicle became unavailable, why it remained unavailable and what loss is attributed to that period. It does not simply combine all accident-related inconvenience into the repair invoice.
02 / LEGAL PREPARATION
Build a repair and delay chronology
Record the incident, towing, inspection, workshop delivery, repair authorisation, parts orders, work performed and collection. Keep the workshop correspondence and expert reports explaining those stages. Distinguish the time required for necessary repairs from other delay allegations, such as a wait for parts or a disagreement about payment. Identify what is known from dated documents and what remains an estimate. If the owner could collect the vehicle earlier but did not, the reason may need explanation. Conversely, a promised collection date may not show that the vehicle was actually ready. The relevant period should be supported by the actual repair process and technical material. A general statement that the car was in the workshop for a certain number of days does not answer every question about responsibility for those days.
03 / LEGAL PREPARATION
Document replacement transport and actual expenditure
Keep rental agreements, invoices, payment evidence and the period of use where replacement transport was obtained. Explain the relationship between the replacement vehicle and the original vehicle’s function. A choice to hire a more expensive class may require an explanation; the invoice alone does not determine the recoverable amount. Where a policy provides an assistance vehicle, retain the request, response and relevant conditions. State whether it was offered, supplied or refused, and on what terms. Other transport costs should likewise be connected to the period and use being claimed. Do not describe all expenditure during repair as automatically attributable to the accident. The legal assessment concerns the actual loss, its evidential basis, the relevant obligation and the suitable party to whom the request is directed.
04 / LEGAL PREPARATION
Commercial use needs a different evidence comparison
For a delivery, service or other business vehicle, identify the activity and how the interruption affected it. Gross receipts are not necessarily the same as the claimed financial loss. Contracts, work records, invoices, cancellations and the cost of an alternative arrangement may be relevant. Compare the period before the incident with the interruption and explain unrelated changes in demand. If work continued using another vehicle, record that fact and its expense rather than presenting all turnover as lost. If a separate driver or operator is involved, clarify who incurred which loss. This evidence comparison does not assume a particular calculation method or recovery. It helps establish what the business claim is actually based on and what further accounting or technical assessment may be needed.
05 / LEGAL PREPARATION
An example of two different demands from one repair
Suppose an owner requests the repair cost from an insurer and separately asks a responsible party to compensate for documented loss of vehicle use. A clear file identifies the evidence, legal basis and recipient for each demand. If the same rental expense has already been paid, show it in the payment register and address any remaining balance rather than requesting it again. If there is also a disputed assistance service under casco, retain the service request and policy wording separately. The next step may involve an insurer application, another contractual request or a claim against a responsible person. The appropriate route cannot be determined solely from the fact that the vehicle was unavailable. The complete documents and requested remedy should guide the assessment.
PRIMARY REFERENCES